A while ago I did a presentation for the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance on utilization of traditional and social media as it relates to media relations professionals. Since then, I’ve received a few requests for the slides, so I decided to post them here:
If you have questions, feel free to submit them via the comments.
The first full day of the Science Writers 2009 conference will be hard to top. I’m exhausted, but I feel like I am taking a lot of really excellent information away from the sessions I attended today. After the morning plenary, which I missed because I was unpacking my previously-lost-by-United-Airlines bag, I attended two sessions on using video (one was a hands-on workshop) and a third on social media and journalism.
During the first session, “Why Science Writers Should Embrace Cheap Video Cameras, YouTube, and Final Cut Pro,” speaker, Andrew Revkin of the New York Time’s DotEarth blog, spoke about the value of adding video to print media. He couldn’t attend the conference in person, so he gave his presentation via skype, standing in front of a chalkboard featuring some rather impressive looking calculations, which some audience members saw as reminiscent of CBS’s Big Bang Theory. Revkin said that, with video, you can reach people who might not read the article, but would search YouTube for information. On his DotEarth blog, Revkin not only uses video to tell his stories, but also encourages readers to share their videos, and he incorporates them on the blog. Revkin feels that the fear of video journalism hurting traditional journalism is unfounded, in that video can sometimes tell a story much more vividly. Revkin encouraged the audience to increase their video utilization, even going so far as to suggest that since videocameras are so small these days, there is really no reason not to keep one with you whenever you go out to work on a story (the Sanyo xacti and the Cannon G10, which is technically a still camera but shoots video, were offered as examples). He encouraged the audience not to be afraid to get close to people when filming so you can get good sound and a better image. Fellow Panelist, Craig Duff, director of Multimedia for TIME.com concurred adding that he sometimes he wishes he could break the zoom on people’s cameras so that they would stop relying on it.
In Duff’s presentation, he shared his personal mantra for web videos, “Webby, Wiki, Sticky.” He says all videos need to be webby, in that they need to be short and web appropriate, wiki, in that they should teach/inform the viewer, and sticky, in that the videos need to keep people engaged and not bore them. He added that while going viral isn’t the goal, if something funny happens while you are filming a science story, by all means, put it up on YouTube. It is important to remember that there are multiple audiences out there, so not everything has to be cool/funny/etc.
Examples of how video can be used to make science seem cool came from Brian Manlow, the science comedian.
Marc Airhart, a science writer for the University of Texas, discussed the value of creating slideshows, with audio, for telling stories. He uses a program called Soundslides, which is very easy to use. In the next session, I went to a workshop on slideshows, where they taught us how to use Soundslides (via the free demo). I didn’t love this program — I felt it had too many limitations for being a paid application. However, the session was still valuable in its discussion of slideshows. During the session, I made this one using Final Cut Express:
It really only took half an hour, and that included choosing pictures, figuring out what I was going to say, and recording the audio.
At the end of the session on using video, the presenters each shared a bit of parting advice, for those about to venture into the world of video journalism:
The next big session I attended was called “The Secret Life of Social Media.” In this session, David Harris, editor-in-chief of symmetry magazine and deputy communications director at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, provided an excellent breakdown of social bookmarking sites. These sites, such as digg, slashdot, reddit and stumbleupon, are intended to crowd-source the selecting of good stories. Theoretically, votes from users drive an article to the top of the list, and to the attention of other users. However, it doesn’t always work that way. Harris explained it thusly:
Harris shared his slides, which can be found here:
Alexis Madrigal, writer at wired.com, also talked about crowd sourcing of content selection, and the importance of being a “useful node in the network.” This fits well with my personal mantra for social media, “Be Useful.” Alexis’ slides are available here:
Recently Twitter has been making efforts to clean up the system and get rid of spam accounts. While rather laudable, their method is not without challenges.
Last week, during the Gov2.0 Summit downtown, several users who chose to live-tweet the event using the hash tag #gov20e found themselves on the wrong side of the twitter fail whale (or rather, the Twitter Foul Owl. See image, courtesy of TechCrunch).
Due to what Twitter saw as “strange activity,” they temporarily suspended the accounts. Several reports claim that the accounts have since been reinstated.
The #gov20e hash tag was a trending topic last Tuesday, and there were several rather-prolific tweeters among those who had their accounts suspended. Maybe twitter just couldn’t imagine that there were enough media geeks in the government to reach the level of a trending topic, and assumed it had to be fake. After all, who could blame them? <wink>
This morning I gave a presentation to members of the Ovarian Cancer of National Alliance about utilization of traditional and social media to advance the mission of their organizations. It doing my research for the presentation I came across the results of a survey of journalists by TopRank Online Marketing that had some surprising results.
For one, 64 percent of journalists used Google or Yahoo! to search for news. Not Lexis/Nexis, but Google. And, while standard Google/Yahoo! searches were the most common, 27 percent of journalists had conducted what they were calling social searches. Of the social tools used, 64 percent used social networks, 55 percent used blogs, 50 percent used wikis and 35 percent used micro-blogging sites like twitter and facebook. So you know what this means folks — Facebook isn’t just for teenage girls anymore!
In fact, the average age of a Facebook user is 26, according to another report by iStrategyLabs. Of the 200 million active users, the 35-54 age group is the fastest growing. Of course only about 30 percent of the users are considered “active,” but that’s still a huge number, and growing everyday.
And what about the microblogging? Well twitter’s audience is even older — 31 is the average according to Social Media Today. The users are 53 percent female, and 35 percent live in urban areas. Twitter use is also growing rapidly, with 12.9 million new users per month.
With only 140 characters to work with, you wouldn’t think you’d be able to accomplish much on twitter, but I’ve actually met quite a few science writers and public relations people on twitter. It’s become a great tool for professional networking, which is really surprising for a site who’s sole purpose is to allow you to answer the question “What are you doing?”